Видео

Bro making tony stark power core type sh!t

I don't like the mixing up of co-ordinate notation with vector notation. A co-ordinate is not a vector, and vice versa. t(a, b, c) is a little meaningless when you think about it.

Nice video. How did you prevent the organisms from suffering phototoxicity? Are you using an ND filter to cut down the amount of light? Or some other method. I'm just starting. My organisms stained with AO die within seconds.

Gosh after struggling to still understanding this concept and how to do it properly by two TAs in my lab this video finally cleared my confusion ToT! Thank you so much! I struggled with partial derivatives but you made this explanation so easy to understand ^_^

This was great but you forgot to turn your dog whistle off

This is all descriptive and nothing intuitive. Time was spent on typing and repeating well known statements, nothing new, nothing inspiring. Sorry mate, i need to be truthful.

I found this because I wanted to know if octopus can eat urchins, now I just have more questions

автор пидор-ДИЗЛАЙК!!! МЫ ПЕДИКОВ НЕ ЛЮБИМ!!!

7:00 why do that ? when you multiplied the numbers, you can't solve y and z because they don't eliminate. Right now its -3z and +3z in each equation. Use elimination (so substitution) and add those equations for x=0. You can find a precise point of the line when you make x=0, add line A and B, the 3z cancels, and youre left with y=-16. Then put y=-16 into either equation, you're left with z=-26, so now your vector is x,y,z=(0,-16,-26) (a starting point but any starting point would do) + t(3,15,23) (your position vector from n1xn2), or written parametrically. x=0+3t, y=-16+15t, z=-26+23t. When you doubled the number, you have not eliminated y/z from the equation...the number is irrelevant.

This was pretty helpful. We were told to build formulas for finding the uncertainties without having a clue of what to do.

Thank you! this was very helpful. I had a difficult time grasping the concept and this video explained it very well.

Bagaimana cara membuat nya...

Thank

THANKS. A. LOT.

I've been almost in tears for basically 3 hours trying to understand this - this is just what I needed. Thanks man

Something that feels weird when doing this is that the equation for a plane and the equation for a line are in completely different forms. One is an implicit equation constraining three variables, the other is an explicit function of 1 input. The plane equivalent of the equation of a line given feels like it should be a point and two vectors. (Of course I may have an unorthodox perspective after seeing the line intersection between two planes gotten by a single multiplication of the planes in question.)

Ok... so i get this is 10 years old but... i just stumbled upon this and now i can stop telling people i have "videographic memory"... I NEED MORE CONTENT ON THIS... PLEASE!!!

what happened to the guy in the gray sweatshirt?

thanks man

This method could get a bit confusing if you forget to remember octa- refers to the shape of octahedron, the 6 vertices being the position of each atom, octa doesnt refer to 8atoms but 6

Very informal thanks!

thank you man

Wooooah so green!

Such a brilliant intro & video 🥰❤️😍. Pls keep it up.

Crystal clear

although 9 years has passed, you still saved my life before a midterm

thank you so much, u literally saved my life today LOL

Is it possible to stream from raspberry pi to esp module?

Well captured! However, this is not a nematode but a ciliate. Very likely from the genus Spitostomum (I have a video in it so you can compare!)

Very well captured! DIC is excellent for pond life :)

Thanks sir..👍❤️

The entropy of isothermal process for both compression and expansion is the same right ?

Very helpful! Thanks!

The opposing emf produced by an inductor is a characteristic of the non-Coulomb electric field that is proportional to the rate of change in current causing a changing magnetic field. And that is Faraday's Law. The current is a result of the combination of an opposing Coulomb electric field and the applied field which is changing the current. The opposing Coulomb field is a result of polarization of the inductor by the non-Coulomb electric field. So, the current is a consequence of the resultant field of the applied field and the Coulomb electric field in the inductance coil and is determined using the governing relation in conductors J = σE_net. It is not possible in this post to discuss in more detail the formation of the Coulomb field when the current in an inductor is changed. Before learning Faraday's Law and its application to the operation of inductors, it will be instructive to understand Current, the conduction process and Voltage at the fundamental level as in the following two videos: i. ruclips.net/video/TTtt28b1dYo/видео.html and ii. ruclips.net/video/8BQM_xw2Rfo/видео.html The last frame References in video #1 lists textbooks 3 and 4 which discusses topics on inductance and inductors in more detail using a unified approach and provides an intuitive understanding of inductive reactance. It also describes with sequential diagrams how an inductor develops the induced emf. Textbook 4 shows how the current lags the voltage across the inductor by 90 degrees for sinusoidal input voltages using sequential diagrams.

thanks scott I will have a go at this project

HELLO, I AM HERE TO CORRECT THIS VIDEO. So, all the questions in the comments are talking about the squared deltas. This is wrong. The /ONLY/ mistake in this video is the partial derivatives. NONE of them should be multiplied by the delta he has. His first partial: dP/dR = A / L , that's it. There is no deltaR in that partial derivative, because the derivative of R is 1, not the uncertainty. His second partial: dP/dL = R*A / L^2. The derivative of 1 / L is -1 / L^2. His third is the same reasoning as the first. That's it. Fix those partial derivatives, plug them back into the formula, and you're golden.

Thanks , respect from india ❤️

What do you think of improve your intelligence using Rotogenflux Methods? I see many people keep on talking about Rotogenflux Methods.

Hi there, I want to know if Rotogenflux Methods, will work for me? I see a lot of people keep on speaking about this iq course.

Thank you,Scott. Finally I made my audio reactive led strip work on a completely new raspberry Pi OS.

How to be sure that the intersection line is not parallel to the x-axis?

It's still amaze me just how a number of people do not know about Rotogenflux Methods despite the fact that a lot of people improve their intelligence with it. Thanks to my personal friend who told me about this. I have improve my IQ in a short period of time.

Has anyone used the Rotogenflux Methods to increase your IQ of 23 points? Simply just do a search engine search. On there you'll find an awesome suggestions about how you can increase your IQ score over 17 points. Why don't you give it a shot? maybe it is going to work for you too.

any tutorial on setting it up for PC ... i didt understand well frm Github. NOOb

What were you doing during 8 min ~9 min over an equation group? If you hold x=0, you’ll find 3z and -3z can offset each other and find y=y=-18 in no more ten seconds. Your twisting calculation made me like a scratch cat.

H2O has two lone pairs. Can this please be corrected.

What software do you use?

Visualization is working but nothing happening in led i am pissed off now

Which ESP are you using?

Quite helpful